Independent curiosity. Traceable sources.FOUNDING EDITION   /   12 OCTOBER 2026Our evidence standard
Reporter / Evidence profile

Michael Shellenberger

Founder of Public; journalist and November 2024 congressional witness

The reporter who brought claims about an alleged UAP intelligence program called Immaculate Constellation into the 2024 congressional hearing.

By UFO Aliens News Research DeskPublished Sources checked
Public claim or contribution

Sources told Shellenberger that the government held UAP imagery and reporting withheld from Congress and public investigators.

Basis of knowledge

Firsthand reporting and source interviews; his hearing testimony relays other people's alleged access to UAP programs and imagery.

Background and documented career

The House listed Shellenberger as the founder of Public when he appeared at its November 13, 2024 hearing. His contribution belongs in a directory of the public disclosure debate, but the category matters: he testified as a journalist presenting reporting, rather than as a military eyewitness to the encounters described in that reporting. [1]

What has been claimed or reported

His written submission described a source's report about an alleged program named Immaculate Constellation. According to the allegations he relayed, it consolidated military and intelligence observations of UAP, including imagery collected by multiple types of sensors. He argued that Congress lacked access to significant information and should pursue stronger oversight. [2]

He also described a source claiming to have watched a lengthy video of an orb emerging from the sea near Kuwait. The relevant evidentiary chain is a source describing a video to a reporter. The cited testimony does not turn that description into Shellenberger's own encounter or provide the underlying recording for examination. [2]

What the public record supports

The official House hearing package preserves his testimony and lists a separate Immaculate Constellation report among the supporting documents. This confirms that the allegations were submitted and discussed. An ODNI document released under FOIA also records the public controversy, but explicitly treats the program as alleged and summarizes press reporting. [1] [3]

Limits, disputes and open questions

The same ODNI document records the Defense Department's statement that it had no present or historical record of a special-access program with that name. This is a documented official denial, which should appear alongside the allegation rather than disappear behind a headline. [3]

A congressional archive is evidence that a claim entered the hearing record; it is not an institutional finding that the claim is true. Likewise, the ODNI summary does not authenticate a hidden program merely because it is an intelligence-community document. Those are limits of the cited records, not a determination that the source's account is false. [1] [3]

Timeline of the account and record

  1. 2024-10

    Reporting brings the alleged Immaculate Constellation program into public discussion. [3]

  2. 2024-11-06

    ODNI approves release of its summary of the allegation and Pentagon denial. [3]

  3. 2024-11-13

    Testifies at the House UAP hearing; related documents enter its record. [1]

Official hearing record

Read the statement and full proceedings alongside the profile.

Sources and what they establish

  1. Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth — hearing repository ↗U.S. House of Representatives · 2024-11-13

    Witness identity, hearing date, written submission and separately listed Immaculate Constellation document.

  2. Written testimony of Michael Shellenberger ↗U.S. House of Representatives · 2024-11-13

    His attributed source allegations, program description, Kuwait video account and calls for oversight.

  3. Description of Alleged IMMACULATE CONSTELLATION Program ↗Office of the Director of National Intelligence · 2024-11-06

    Official document characterizing the account as a press allegation and recording the Pentagon's denial; release date appears on the page.

How to read this profile

A documented career, a personal observation, an attributed allegation and corroboration are assessed separately. Source publication does not make every statement within it independently verified. This profile is original, AI-assisted research and has not received independent expert review. Our assessment method · Corrections policy.